Effectiveness and safety of ultra-low-dose spinal anesthesia versus perineal blocks in hemorroidectomy and anal fistula surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background: Ultra-low-dose Spinal Anesthesia (SA) is the practice of employing minimal doses of intrathecal agents so that only the roots that supply a specific area are anesthetized. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultra-low-dose spinal anesthesia with that of Perineal Blocks (PB). Methods: A two-arm, parallel, double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing two anesthetic techniques (SA and PB) for hemorrhoidectomy and anal fistula surgery was performed. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain, complementation and/or conversion of anesthesia, and hemodynamic changes. Results: Fifty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. The mean pain values were similar in the first 48 h in both groups (p > 0.05). The individuals allocated to the SA group did not need anesthetic complementation; however, those in the PB group required it considerably (SA group, 0% vs. PB group, 25%; p = 0.005). Hemodynamic changes were more pronounced after PB: during all surgical times, the PB group showed lower MAP values and higher HR values (p < 0.05). Postoperative urinary retention rates were similar between both groups (SA group 0% vs. PB group 3.1%, p = 0.354). Conclusion: SA and PB are similarly effective in pain control during the first 48 h after hemorrhoidec-tomy and anal fistula surgery. Although surgical time was shorter among patients in the PB group, the SA technique may be preferable as it avoids the need for additional anesthesia. Furthermore, the group that received perineal blocks was under sedation with a considerable dose of propofol.

Accidente fatal debido al uso de ácido tranexámico vía intratecal. Presentación de caso

Los errores en la administración de medicamentos durante la anestesia continúan siendo una causa importante de morbimortalidad, incluso en países industrializados. El ácido tranexámico es un agente antifibrinolítico indicado para reducir el sangramiento perioperatorio en varios procederes quirúrgicos. Se presenta el caso de una gestante de 23 años con 37,2 semanas de gestación, en el Baringo Country Referral Hospital, de Kenia. Durante la administración de la anestesia raquídea en la cesárea, se le aplicó de forma accidental este medicamento por vía intratecal. La paciente comenzó con mioclonías de miembros inferiores, convulsiones tonicoclónicas, y llegó a la parada cardiorrespiratoria. Se ingresó en Cuidados Intensivos, donde se identificaron signos indirectos de muerte encefálica, y falleció al sexto día de su ingreso. La literatura reporta que la mortalidad por este accidente anestésico en embarazadas es muy elevada, debido a altas concentraciones del medicamento en el líquido cefalorraquídeo.

Errors in the drugs administration during anesthesia continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality, even in industrialized countries. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic agent indicated to reduce perioperative bleeding in several surgical procedures. The case of a 23-years-old pregnant woman with 32.7 weeks of pregnancy treated at the Baringo Referral Hospital, in Kenya, is presented. During the administration of spinal anesthesia in the cesarean section, this medication was accidentally applied intrathecally. The patient began with myoclonus of the lower limbs, tonic-clonic seizures, and reached cardio-respiratory arrest. She was admitted to Intensive Care, where indirect signs of brain death were identified, and she died on the six day after admission. The literature reports that mortality for this anesthetic accident is very high, due to high concentration of the drug in the cerebrospinal fluid.

Prognostic predictive model for PONV in cesarean delivery

Introduction: Apfel simplified risk score for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has shown to be useful in anesthesia; however, since it has not been calibrated in regional anesthesia or in pregnant patients, its use in cesarean section is limited. Objective: To develop a prognostic predictive model for postoperative nausea and vomiting in pregnant patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods: In a cohort of 703 term pregnant patients scheduled of cesarean section, 15 variables were prospectively assessed, to design a prognostic predictive model for the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A logistic regression analysis was used to construct the model and its calibration and discrimination were based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, the calibration curves, and C statistic. Additionally, the internal calibration was performed with the Bootstrap resampling method. Results: Postoperative nausea and vomiting were experienced by 27% of the patients during the first six hours after surgery. The model included as prognostic variables the development of intraoperative nausea and vomiting, age under 28 years, a history of PONV, the mother's BMI and the weight of the newborn baby. The model showed an adequate calibration (x2: 4.65 p: 0.5888), though a low discrimination (Statistic C = 0.68). Conclusions: A prognostic predictive model was created for the development of PONV in cesarean section. This model was used to build a prognostic scale for the classification of patients into risk groups.

Introducción: La escala de riesgo simplificada de Apfel para náuseas y vómito posoperatorio (NVPO) ha mostrado utilidad en anestesia; sin embargo, al no haber sido calibrada en anestesia regional o en pacientes embarazadas, su utilidad en cesárea es limitado. Objetivo: Desarrollar un modelo de predicción pronóstica para náuseas y vómito posoperatorios en pacientes embarazadas, llevadas a cesárea bajo anestesia espinal. Métodos: En una cohorte de 703 pacientes con embarazo a término programadas para cesárea, se evaluaron 15 variables de forma prospectiva para construir un modelo de predicción pronóstica para el desarrollo de náuseas y vómito posoperatorio. Se utilizó el análisis de regresión logística para la construcción del modelo y se calculó su calibración y discriminación con la prueba de Hosmer-Lemeshow, las curvas de calibración y el estadístico C. Además, se realizó la calibración interna con el método de remuestreo Bootstrap. Resultados: Las náuseas y vómito posoperatorio se presentaron en el 27% de las pacientes durante las primeras seis horas después de la cirugía. El modelo incluyó como variables pro-nósticas el desarrollo de náuseas y vómito en el intraoperatorio, edad menor de 28 años, antecedentes de NVPO, índice de masa corporal (IMC) de la madre y el peso del recién nacido. El modelo mostró una adecuada calibración (x2: 4,65 p: 0,5888), aunque una baja discriminación (Estadístico C = 0,68). Conclusiones: Se construyó un modelo de predicción pronóstica para el desarrollo de NVPO en cirugía cesárea, y con este se construyó una escala pronóstica que permite clasificar a las pacientes por grupos de riesgo.

Efectividad de la colecistectomía laparoscópica de puerto único asistida con imanes bajo anestesia espinal

Objetivo: Determinar la efectividad de la colecistectomía laparoscópica de puerto único asistida por imanes bajo anestesia espinal en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la colecistopatía litiásica crónica. Material y Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de cohorte en 51 pacientes entre octubre de 2019 y febrero de 2021. 17 pacientes fueron sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica de puerto único asistida por imanes y 34 a colecistectomía laparoscópica convencional por un mismo equipo quirúrgico. Se aplicó la técnica quirúrgica descrita por Dominguez et al y SAGES, bajo anestesia espinal. Se realizó estadística descriptiva e inferencial, analizando el dolor postoperatorio a las 3, 6, 12, 24 y 72 h y la satisfacción de los pacientes. Resultados: Se encontró diferencia significativa en el dolor postoperatorio en el grupo de estudio a las 6 h (p = 0,022), 12 h (p = 0,039), 24 h (p = 0,025) y 72 h (p < 0,001). En la satisfacción se encuentra un RR de 3 (p = 0,001), sin diferencia significativa en el tiempo operatorio y horas de hospitalización postquirúrgicas. Conclusiones: La colecistectomía laparoscópica de puerto único asistida por imanes, bajo anestesia espinal, ha demostrado efectividad en la reducción importante del dolor postoperatorio a partir de las 6 h, y en la superación de las expectativas en los intervenidos, sin aumento significativo de tiempo operatorio ni estancia hospitalaria.

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of magnet-assisted single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia in surgical treatment of chronic lithiasic cholecystopathy. Materials and Method: Prospective cohort study in 51 patients between October 2019 and February 2021. 17 patients underwent magnet-assisted single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 34 underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the same surgical team. The surgical technique described by Dominguez and SAGES was used, under spinal anesthesia. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed, analyzing postoperative pain at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours and patient satisfaction. Results: A significant difference in postoperative pain was found in the study group at 6 h (p = 0.022), 12 h (p = 0.039), 24 h (p = 0.025) and 72 h (p < 0.001). In satisfaction, there is an RR of 3 (p = 0.001), with no significant difference in operative time and postoperative hospitalization hours. Conclusions: Magnet-assisted single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia has shown effectiveness in significantly reducing postoperative pain after 6h, associated with significantly exceeding expectations in those operated on, without a significant increase in operative time or hospital stay.

The Effects Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Pre-Eclamptic Mothers Underwent Caesarean Delivery in a Tertiary Care Hospital- A Comparative Study

Background: Preeclampsia is a multisystem disorder characterized by new onset of hypertension systolic blood pressure ?140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ?90 mmHg and proteinuria >300 mg/24 h arising after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive woman and associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Women with preeclampsia have an increased rate of cesarean section consequent upon the high incidence of intrauterine growth restriction, fetal distress, and prematurity. The aim of this study was to determine and compare maternal & neonatal outcome among pre-eclamptic women following caesarian delivery under general and spinal anesthesia. Material & Methods: This was a comparative observational study and was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology of Holy Family red crescent Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from February,2020 to February,2023. In this study we included 250 preeclamptic women undergoing cesarean delivery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups – GA group (Patients who were given general anesthesia) & SA group (Patients who were given spinal anesthesia). Results: In total 250 patients from both the groups completed the study. In our study we found majority (44.8%) of our patients were aged 28-32 years. The mean age was 27.13 ± 3.76 years. Majority (62.8% ) of our patients were cases of emergency caesarean delivery & 37.2% were elective caesarean delivery classes. Most of the students (41.2%) used magnesium sulfate. Intraoperative systolic BP, diastolic BP was significantly lower in SA group than GA group. We found headache, vomiting, fever and wound gaping, postpartum hemorrhage & lower respiratory tract infection was significantly higher in GA group. On contrary, hypotension & pulmonary edema was higher in SA group. Apgar score at 1st, 5th & 10th minutes was significantly higher in GA group than SA group. In GA group, neonatal mortality at 48 h was 10.4% whereas it was 4.8% in SA group. Conclusion: In our study, we found intra-operative blood pressure and pulse rate was observed significantly higher in GA group than SA. Severe preeclamptic mothers receiving general anesthesia and their babies required more critical care support. Maternal as well as neonatal mortality was significantly higher with general anesthesia. Therefore, spinal anesthesia is a safer alternative to general anesthesia among women with severe preeclampsia following caesarean delivery with less postoperative morbidity and mortality.

A Comparative Analysis Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Many surgeries can be performed with spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA). However, there are only limited and confounding data available regarding costs and anesthesia-related times. Hip or knee replacement are common orthopedic surgeries that can be performed using SA or GA without differences regarding mortality or morbidity. Observational studies have suggested that spinal anesthesia may be associated with lower risks of death, delirium and major medical complications and with shorter lengths of stay in the hospital than general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Material & Methods: This was a comparative observational study and was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology of Holy Family red crescent Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from March,2021 to March,2023. In this study we included 200 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups – Group A (Patients who were given general anesthesia) & Group B (Patients who were given spinal anesthesia). Results: In total 200 patients from both the groups completed the study. In our study we found majority (44.5%) of our patients were aged 60-69 years and most of our patients were female (56%) compared to male (44%).The mean age of our patients was 61.73 ± 7.92 years. The mean BMI was 31.67±3.24 kg/m.2Among all patients ,48% had mild systemic disease and followed by 31.5% had severe systemic disease. Majority (43.5%) of our patients had hypertension, 31% had diabetes. Vomiting was found 47% in group A on contrary only 23% had vomiting in spinal group. We found the mean anesthesia induction time was significantly higher in spinal group. Anesthesia time was lower in spinal group while PACU time was higher in group B. Time duration of surgery was significantly lower in spinal group. After 24 hours, spinal group showed less pain score than general anesthesia group. Conclusion: In our study, we found that SA is associated with less fixed and variable costs and lower postoperative pain scores during the stay in the PACU. Therefore, SA is a more reasonable alternative to GA in the immediate postoperative period for patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. When compared to general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia provides better operating circumstances, better postoperative pain control, and faster postoperative recovery.

Comparative Study on the Effects and Complications of Transverse Insertion of Two Fine Gauge Quincke’s Spinal Needles 26 and 29 G in Spinal Anesthesia

Introduction:Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly used techniques in modern anesthesia. Spinal needles have evolved over time to increase efficacy and decrease complications. Fine gauge spinal needles technically consume more time but are advisable in certain clinical conditions such as raised intracranial pressure and when patient well‑being and comfort are the priorities. Hence, we undertook this study to compare the effects and complication of transverse insertion of Quincke’s spinal needle 26 G (gauge) and 29 G. Materials and Methods: Hundred patients of age 18–40 years posted for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were allocated into two groups of 50 each to receive spinal anesthesia with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine using 26 G or 29 G Quincke’s spinal needle. All the patients were evaluated for the time of drug administration, number of attempts, time to attain sensory blockade up to T8 level, time to attain motor blockade up to bromage Grade 3, and incidence of post‑dural puncture headache (PDPH) and post‑dural puncture backache. Results: Demographic data were comparable in both groups. The PDPH incidence on 3rd day for 29 G Quincke’s was 0% while for 26 G Quincke’s was 12%. There was statistically significant difference when 26 G Quincke’s was compared with 29 G Quincke’s for number of attempts, time of drug administration, time to attain motor and sensory block. Conclusion: 29 G Quincke’s spinal could be used to provide spinal anesthesia in young adult patients owing to adequate sensory and motor blockade with no incidence of PDPH and backache.

Rachianesthésie en ambulatoire au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Andrainjato Fianarantsoa, Madagascar: tolérance et efficacité / Ambulatory spinal anaesthesia at the Andrainjato University Hospital of Fianarantsoa, Madagascar: tolerance and effectiveness

La rachianesthésie ambulatoire est une des méthodes d'anesthésies loco- régionales de plus en plus utilisées car permet une réhabilitation précoce. L'objectif de l'étude est d'évaluer la tolérance et l'efficacité de la rachianesthésie réalisée en ambulatoire. Méthodes : Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective, analytique réalisée au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Andrainjato Fianarantsoa pendant cinq ans (du mois de janvier 2016 au mois de décembre 2020). La tolérance de la rachianesthésie était évaluée par la fréquence et la gravité des incidents peropératoires et complications postopératoires. Son efficacité était estimée par le taux de sortie le jour de l'intervention et la ré-hospitalisation. Résultats : Soixante-quatre patients âgés de 44 [14-85] ans ont bénéficié d'une chirurgie viscérale, gynécologique, traumatologique ou vasculaire sous rachianesthésie. L'hypotension artérielle (n=04) et les nausées et vomissements peropératoires (n = 01) étaient les incidents retrouvés. Les complications postopératoires étaient la céphalée (n = 13), la douleur postopératoire d'intensité modérée à intense (n = 05) et les nausées et vomissements (n = 02). L'âge supérieur à 50 ans (p = 0,012) et une dose supérieure à 12 mg de bupivacaïne (p = 0,011) étaient corrélés à l'hypotension artérielle peropératoire. Le genre féminin (p = 0,004) et l'utilisation de la bupivacaïne hyperbare (p = 0,027) étaient associés aux complications postopératoires. Tous ces patients étaient sortis le jour même de l'intervention sans ré-hospitalisation. Conclusion : La rachianesthésie ambulatoire connaît actuellement un grand essor dans la pratique anesthésique. La prévention de certaines complications devrait être systématique afin d'optimiser sa tolérance et son efficacité

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Quadratus Lumborum Block and Intrathecal Morphine for Postcesarean Analgesia / Ensaio Clínico Randomizado Comparando Bloqueio do Quadrado Lombar e Morfina Intratecal Para Analgesia Pós-cesariana

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of quadratus lumborum (QL) block and intrathecal morphine (M) for postcesarean delivery analgesia. Methods Thirty-one pregnant women with ≥ 37 weeks of gestation submitted to elective cesarean section were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to either the QL group (12.5 mg 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia and 0.3 ml/kg 0.2% bupivacaine for QL block) or the M group (12.5 mg bupivacaine 0.5% and 100 mcg of morphine in spinal anesthesia). The visual analog scale of pain, consumption of morphine and tramadol for pain relief in 48 hours, and side effects were recorded. Results Median pain score and/or pain variation were higher in the morphine group than in the QL group (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the consumption of morphine or tramadol between groups over time. Side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were observed only in the morphine group. Conclusion Quadratus lumborum block and intrathecal morphine are effective for analgesia after cesarean section. Patients undergoing QL block had lower postoperative pain scores without the undesirable side effects of opioids such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.

Resumo Objetivo Comparar a eficácia do bloqueio do quadrado lombar (QL) e da morfina intratecal (M) na analgesia pós-cesariana. Métodos Trinta e uma gestantes com ≥ 37 semanas de gestação submetidas a cesariana eletiva foram incluídas no estudo. Eles foram alocados aleatoriamente no grupo QL (12,5 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% para raquianestesia e 0,3 ml/kg de bupivacaína a 0,2% para bloqueio de QL) ou no grupo M (12,5 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% e 100 mcg de morfina na raquianestesia). A escala visual analógica de dor, consumo de morfina e tramadol para alívio da dor em 48 horas e efeitos colaterais foram registrados. Resultados A mediana do escore de dor e/ou variação da dor foi maior no grupo morfina do que no grupo QL (p = 0,02). Não houve diferença significativa no consumo de morfina ou tramadol entre os grupos ao longo do tempo. Efeitos colaterais como prurido, náuseas e vômitos foram observados apenas no grupo morfina. Conclusão O bloqueio QL e a morfina intratecal são eficazes para analgesia após cesariana. Os pacientes submetidos ao bloqueio do QL apresentaram menores escores de dor pós-operatória sem os efeitos colaterais indesejáveis dos opioides, como náuseas, vômitos e prurido.

Combination of Low?Dose Spinal Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia as Anesthetic Management in Patient with Uncorrected Double Outlet Right Ventricle (DORV) Underwent Cesarean Section

Pregnant patients with uncorrected Double Outlet Right Ventricle (DORV) undergoing cesarean section are challenging for anesthesiologists. We present a case of a 24?year?old woman with a gestational age of 30–32 weeks with DORV, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary hypertension, and stage C functional class III heart failure who was successfully managed using a combination of low?dose spinal anesthesia bupivacaine 0.5% 7.5 mg with adjuvant fentanyl 50 mcg and epidural ropivacaine 0.2%, and fentanyl 50 mcg TV 10 cc given 30 minutes after the birth of her baby. Hemodynamics was stable after low?dose spinal anesthesia and until the end of the operation.

Anestesia raquídea con bupivacaína isobárica en cesáreas / Spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine in cesarean sections

En la anestesia para las cesáreas, la anestesia raquídea con bupivacaína hiperbárica constituye la elección habitual en nuestro medio. Existen dos formas de bupivacaína disponibles, la isobárica (BI) y la hiperbárica (BH). La utilización de la BI es poco frecuente por lo que es relevante conocer la experiencia en su utilización para las anestesias de las cirugías obstétricas. El objetivo del estudio fue caracterizar la utilización de BI en las anestesias raquídeas para cesáreas. Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal en 23 pacientes que recibieron anestesia espinal con BI. La edad promedio fue de 28  5 años, la dosis promedio de BI utilizada de 9,4 mg. La latencia promedio fue 90 segundos y el tiempo para la instauración una anestesia adecuada fue en promedio 4,9 minutos. En el 82,6% el nivel anestésico alcanzó el dermatoma T4. En el 21,7% fue necesario administrar efedrina para aumentar la presión arterial. En el 52,1% se presentaron efectos adversos menores. A las 24 horas, el dolor fue nulo en 56,5% y leve en 43,5% de los casos. En conclusión, se encontró que las pacientes alcanzaron un nivel sensitivo adecuado en poco tiempo, con una dosis promedio de BI de 9 mg. Pocos pacientes requirieron la administración de un vasopresor para aumentar la presión arterial. Los efectos adversos fueron menores en casi la mitad de los pacientes. En el post operatorio la mayoría de las pacientes no presentaron dolor

In anesthesia for caesarean sections, spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine is the usual choice in our setting. There are two forms of bupivacaine available, isobaric (BI) and hyperbaric (BH). The use of BI is infrequent, so it is relevant to know the experience in its use for anesthesia in obstetric surgeries. The objective of the study was to characterize the use of BI in spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections. An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out in 23 patients who received spinal anesthesia with BI. The average age was 28  5 years, the average dose of BI used was 9.4 mg. The average latency was 90 seconds and the time for establishment of adequate anesthesia was on average 4.9 minutes. In 82.6% of the cases, the anesthetic level reached dermatome T4. In 21.7% it was necessary to administer ephedrine to increase blood pressure. Minor adverse effects occurred in 52.1%. At 24 hours, the pain was null in 56.5% and mild in 43.5% of cases. In conclusion, it was found that the patients reached an adequate sensory level in a short time, with an average dose of BI of 9 mg. Few patients required administration of a vasopressor to increase blood pressure. Adverse effects were minor in almost half of the patients. In the postoperative period, most of the patients did not present pain

Effect of anesthesia type on outcome measures in cesarean section in the presence of fetal macrosomia

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean section in pregnancies with macrosomia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1043 patients who delivered by cesarean section between May 2018 and December 2021 and had a baby born with a birth weight of 4000 g or greater. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared according to the type of anesthesia performed in the spinal anesthesia group (n=903; 86.6%) and general anesthesia group (n=140; 13.4%). The Apgar score was categorized into <7 and ≥7. RESULTS: Neonates with an Apgar score of <7 at the first minute (11.4 vs. 0.4%; p<0.001) and the fifth minute (2.9 vs. 0.3%; p=0.004) were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit difference was significantly lower in patients who received spinal anesthesia than those who received general anesthesia [2 (1.1-3.1) vs. 4.05 (2.8-5.35); p<0.001]. The number of patients transfused was higher in the general anesthesia group (9.3 vs. 2.7%; p<0.001). In the regression model, general anesthesia, birth weight, and emergency conditions were significant independent factors related to the preoperative and postoperative hematocrit decrease (p<0.001, p=0.005, and p=0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Apgar scores of <7 at the first and fifth minutes are higher in macrosomic neonates who received general anesthesia than in neonates who received spinal anesthesia. Performing cesarean section under general anesthesia in mothers of macrosomic neonates results in a greater decrease in hematocrit value and a greater need for blood transfusion than under spinal anesthesia.

Anestesia espinal con bupivacaína más morfina en cirugía de urgencia de fractura intertrocantérica de cadera / Spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine plus morphine in urgent intertrochanteric hip fracture surgery

Introducción: La fractura de cadera en el anciano es una entidad frecuente y tiene gran incidencia en el mundo y en Cuba por el envejecimiento. Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de la anestesia espinal con bupivacaína más morfina en la cirugía de fractura intertrocantérica de cadera. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio clínico, experimental, no aleatorizado, prospectivo y de corte longitudinal en el Hospital Universitario Faustino Pérez Hernández de Matanzas de octubre de 2017 a octubre de 2019. El universo estuvo conformado por todos los pacientes quirúrgicos con fractura de cadera del hospital. La muestra se realizó por muestreo intencional, por 120 pacientes elegidos a criterio de los investigadores. Grupo control (B): Anestesia subaracnoidea con bupivacaína 0,5 por ciento 10 mg. Grupo estudio (M): Anestesia subaracnoidea con bupivacaína 0,5 por ciento 7 mg más 0,2 mg de morfina. Cada grupo estuvo integrado por 60 pacientes. Las variables analizadas fueron las siguientes: grupos de edades, género, estado físico, nivel de punción, tiempo de inicio del bloqueo motor, hipotensión arterial, uso de vasopresores y complicaciones secundarias a la técnica anestésica. Resultados: Predominó grupo de 84 y 90 años, género femenino y ASA III. La punción lumbar se realizó entre L3-L4. El tiempo de inicio del bloqueo motor fue 1,3 veces menor en el grupo M. Prevaleció la hipotensión arterial en el grupo B; y uso de vasopresores en ambos grupos. Predominó el prurito, grupo M, y la bradicardia, grupo B como complicaciones. Conclusiones: La asociación bupivacaína/morfina en anestesia espinal en adulto mayor para fractura de cadera proporciona mejores resultados sin complicaciones mayores(AU),

Introduction: Hip fracture in the elderly patient is a frequent entity with a high incidence worldwide and in Cuba due to aging. Objective: To assess the efficacy of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine plus morphine in intertrochanteric hip fracture surgery. Methods: A clinical, experimental, nonrandomized, prospective, prospective and longitudinal study was carried out in Faustino Pérez Hernández University Hospital of Matanzas, from October 2017 to October 2019. The universe consisted of all surgical patients with hip fracture attended in the hospital. The sample was made by purposive sampling, consisting of 120 patients chosen at the discretion of the researchers. The control group (B) was administered subarachnoid anesthesia with 10 mg of bupivacaine 0.5 percent. The study group (M) was administered subarachnoid anesthesia with 7 mg of bupivacaine 0.5 percent. plus 0.2 mg of morphine. Each group consisted of 60 patients. The following variables were analyzed: age groups, gender, physical condition, puncture level, motor block onset time, arterial hypotension, use of vasopressors, and complications secondary to the anesthetic technique. Results: The predominant age group was 84 and 90 years old, together with female gender and ASA III. Lumbar puncture was performed between L3 and L4. The motor block onset time was 1.3 times shorter in the M group. Arterial hypotension prevailed in the B group; apart from the use of vasopressors in both groups. As complications, there was a predominance of pruritus in the M group and bradycardia in the B group. Conclusions: The association bupivacaine/morphine in spinal anesthesia for hip fracture among elderly adults provides better outcomes without major complications(AU)

Comparison of onset of action of Intrathecal Clonidine vs Intrathecal Fentanyl as an adjuvant with hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine alone under spinal anesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgeries

Background: Adjuvants are added to a local anesthetic solution to prolong the duration of analgesia. There is a paucity of studies comparing the onset of action of adjuvants like Clonidine and Fentanyl. In this study, the time of onset of action of intrathecal clonidine and intrathecal fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone were compared in the subarachnoid block for lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Materials and Methods: 90 adult patients posted for orthopedic surgery of the lower limb were divided into three equal groups of 30 each. Group A being the control group was given hyperbaric Bupivacaine(3ml) +0.5ml of Normal saline, Group B was given Intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (3 ml) +30 ?g Clonidine and Group C was given Intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (3 ml) + Fentanyl 25 ?g. The primary objective was to compare the time of onset of block and duration of analgesia. The secondary outcomes were the duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects. Results: The time of onset of the sensory blockade was 4.83 ± 0.64, 1.72 ± 1.47, and 3.4 ± 1.43 mins in groups A, B, and C respectively. The time of onset of the motor blockade as estimated by the time to reach level 2 on the Bromage scale, was 6.07 ± 0.55, 2.38 ± 1.32, and 5.06 ± 1.28 mins in groups A, B, and C respectively. The duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in the Clonidine group compared to the Fentanyl group. Conclusion: The study reveals that the time of onset of action of sensory and motor block was faster and the duration of analgesia was prolonged with adjuvants like Clonidine when compared to Fentanyl when added to Bupivacaine.

The Effect of Intravenous Ketamine After Spinal Anesthesia on the Duration of Postoperative Analgesia and Analgesic Requirement

Objective: To evaluate the impact of ketamine following spinal anesthesia on the duration of postoperative analgesia and the need for analgesics. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study done over a period of two years. A total of 60 participants undergoing elective surgeries under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups. After 10 min of spinal anesthesia and achieving the required level of sensory and motor blockade, both groups were given Inj. Midazolam 1 mg intravenously, followed by Inj. Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg, volume made up to 10 mL with normal saline, given intravenously for Group K and Inj. Normal Saline 10 mL was given intravenously for Group N. Hemodynamic monitoring was done intraoperatively, and the postoperative visual analog score (VAS), sedation score, the mean time for the first rescue analgesia, and the total dose of postoperative analgesic required in 24 h were tabulated. Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of age, weight, ASA grade, and duration of surgery. In Group K, the VAS scores were significantly lower and patients were comfortable when compared to Group N (P value <.01). The mean time to first rescue analgesia was longer in Group K (6.4 ± 1.69 h) when compared to Group N (2.9 ± 1.01 h), and the total dose of postoperative analgesia (Tramadol) required in 24 h was also significantly less in Group K (143.33 ± 56.83 mg) when compared to Group N (236 ± 49.01 mg). Changes in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP)) were statistically and clinically not significant in both the intraoperative and postoperative periods between the groups. Conclusion: Patients in Group K were more comfortable, had a longer duration of postoperative analgesia, and required less dose of rescue analgesia in the postoperative period. Ketamine is a safe drug that is readily available, and it decreases the use of opioids and opioid-related side effects. Therefore, ketamine can serve effectively as an adjunctive analgesic drug.

Spinal Anesthesia for Open Gastrostomy in an Infant after Stage I Norwood for Hypoplastic Left Heart

Infants with hypoplastic left heart are at increased risk of adverse events including mortality when they undergo procedures with general anesthesia in the inter?stage period after stage I Norwood. This is primarily caused by an imbalance between pulmonary and systemic blood flows augmented by decreased function of the single ventricle. These factors can be aggravated by general anesthesia, hence the increased risk. Many of these infants experience feeding dysfunction and require a gastrostomy to optimize nutrition. We report a case of open gastrostomy in an infant with Norwood physiology under spinal anesthesia with an excellent outcome.

Super refractory status epilepticus in a parturient with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia

Super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a rare but serious neurological emergency. This case report aims to highlight the challenges faced during the diagnosis and management of SRSE in a 36-year-old preeclamptic patient taken for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The patient developed a seizure episode minutes after administration of intrathecal bupivacaine, necessitating administration of general anesthesia. Postoperatively, SRSE developed which did not respond to multiple anti-epileptics and thiopentone sodium infusion. Although the clinical picture and magnetic resonance imaging findings supported the diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, the role of intrathecal bupivacaine in causing SRSE could not be ruled out due to the temporal association of events. The patient had a prolonged and complicated hospital stay and despite a multimodal approach to the treatment, suffered neurological sequelae.

Comparison Of Maternal And Fetal Outcome Following Caesarean Section In Pre- Eclamptic Patients Under General And Spinal Anesthesia

Background:Pre-eclampsia is a multi-system disorder in pregnancy associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality and also affects neonatal outcome. Choice of anesthesiatechnique and skillful management is equally important for maternal and fetal well-being. So, this study was designed to compare the maternal and fetal outcome following cesarean section in pre-eclamptic patients under general and spinal anesthesia. Material And Methods:This prospective, randomized observational study was carried out in 60 parturients age between 18 to 40 years divided in two groups 30 parturients in each. ASA Physical Status II and III who delivered after 34 weeks of gestation with criteria of mild pre-eclampsia by means of Elective/emergency C-section were included. After giving pre medication Group G received thiopentone, succinylcholine intravenously before intubation followed by oxygen, sevoflurane and atracurium (after delivery of baby). Group S received spinal anesthesia by using 2 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine. Heart rate, blood pressure, SpO2 of mother and neonate were recorded at specific time points. Also post of ICU shifting of mother for maternal outcome and APGAR score at 1,5,7minutes, ABGA, resuscitation requirement and NICU admission data were recorded for fetal outcome.Result:After induction maternal heart rate and blood pressure were higher side (still within 30% from baseline) in group G as compared to group S. APGAR score, ABGA and NICU shifting requirements had favorable outcome in group S. Conclusion:Spinal anesthesia is first choice as it is more safe, simple and with better maternal and fetal outcome.

Fractura de aguja espinal. Caso reportado durante anestesia raquídea / Spinal needle fracture. Case report during spinal anesthesia

Resumen: La anestesia raquídea o espinal es la técnica anestésica utilizada en diferentes procedimientos quirúrgicos. Para ello, existen diversos tipos de agujas espinales, las cuales tienen un impacto distinto de acuerdo con las características fisiológicas de cada paciente. La fractura de aguja espinal, si bien es muy rara, se cuenta entre los factores de riesgo que pueden desencadenar múltiples complicaciones asociadas con la anestesia raquídea. En este artículo se estudia un caso de esta índole reportado en el Hospital General «La Perla¼, Nezahualcóyotl, y se mencionan los pasos que se siguieron para su resolución. Finalmente, se ofrecen algunos consejos dirigidos a los lectores especializados, en caso de encontrarse ante un incidente similar.

Abstract: Spinal anesthesia is the anesthesic technique of choice for different surgical procedures. There are several kinds of spinal needles, which have a different impact according to each patients physiological characteristics. Even though spinal needle fracture is very rare, it is among the risk factors that may lead to several complications associated with spinal anesthesia. In this article, we refer to a case of spinal needle fracture during an anesthesic procedure, reported at «La Perla¼ General Hospital, in Nezahualcoyotl, State of Mexico. Also, we mention the steps that were followed in order to solve our case. Finally, we offer some advice to the specialized readers, in case they have to face a similar incident.

Juan Evangelista Manrique, the true pioneer of spinal anesthesia in Colombia / El verdadero pionero de la raquianestesia en Colombia: Juan Evangelista Manrique

Abstract Several findings paved the way to the use of the spinal approach for anesthesia. Information about the originators and dates of their discoveries is controversial. According to personal communications, doctors Juan Bautista Montoya y Flórez, in Medellín, and Lisandro Leyva, in Bogotá, in 1904 and 1905 respectively, would appear to be the pioneers of spinal anesthesia in Colombia. Pioneering cases of this procedure carried out in 1901 by doctor Juan Evangelista Manrique and which continued to be performed by his colleagues and assistants of the medical community at the time are documented in the Corporis Fabrica dissertation collection of the National University of Colombia.

Resumen Son varios los hallazgos que contribuyeron al abordaje de la columna vertebral como vía para la administración de anestesia. Los autores y las fechas de tales descubrimientos han sido controvertidos. En Colombia, según fuentes orales, los doctores Juan Bautista Montoya y Flórez, en Medellín, y Lisandro Leyva, en Bogotá, en 1904 y 1905 respectivamente, serían los pioneros de la anestesia raquídea en Colombia. En las tesis de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional, Colección Corporis Fabrica, se documentan los casos pioneros de este procedimiento realizados en 1901, por el doctor Juan Evangelista Manrique y continuados enseguida por sus colegas y ayudantes de la comunidad médica de ese entonces.